For researchers: go from scattered papers to a synthesized, citation-clean academic draft.
For grad students, academics, and research analysts who need defensible writing, not just notes. Reach for this when you have a pile of papers and a deadline: run a formal PRISMA review or a narrative synthesis, pin down themes and gaps, verify every claim and citation, then ship a thesis-driven essay or brief that survives peer review. The full path from literature to a draft you can defend.
Click to play with sound.
Arranged in the author's recommended order. Walk through them in sequence, or open any one on its own.
Runs a PRISMA-compliant systematic review from PICO question and pre-registered protocol through search strings, two-stage screening, risk-of-bias appraisal, and GRADE-rated synthesis.
Produces a thematic literature review that organizes a field into an argument – consensus, disputes, evidence quality, and the open gap the reader should care about.
Verifies that every citation is real, unretracted, and complete, rates source quality by evidence tier, and formats reference lists precisely in APA, MLA, Chicago, or IEEE.
Structures and drafts argumentative academic essays – a contestable thesis, claim-evidence-analysis body paragraphs, a fairly-engaged counterargument, and a synthesizing conclusion – marking every spot that needs a real citation instead of inventing sources.
Writes a concise, evidence-based policy brief – problem, options compared on consistent criteria, and a recommendation – that a decision-maker can act on in minutes.
Verifies discrete factual claims against multiple independent sources and returns a calibrated verdict – Verified, Likely true, Likely false, Unverifiable, or False – with confidence and citations.